Random thoughts on physical security measures

Lately, I’ve been drawn to do some desk research and limited hands-on testing of physical security measures. I’ve written about this subject before, you can find the article here. However, that article was written from the perspective of using social engineering to get into target locations during day time. Which was always lots of fun to do!

This time I was much more wondering about, what if you want to get in at night, while all the security measures are in place? If you wonder why, well for one because it is fun to do this type of breaking & entering legally and also because there are a ton of gadgets or potential gadgets.

This blog is mostly intended to make sure I don’t forget about all kind of possibilities to break in to facilities while all the security measures are enabled. Always useful to talk to yourself in written form right (hence the feeling that it might feel like ramblings, if you decide to read on)? This blog is not intended to determine if physical attacks are the most appropriate attacks to execute, since most attackers nowadays are doing almost everything remote. At least that is the current view on threat actors as far as I can tell from public sources.

Keep in mind that I’m no expert on this subject and that most of these options have only been desk researched and others are sort of a hobby for me. Basically: I am pretty sure I’m gonna be wrong in a couple of places. Feel free to leave better suggestions in the comments.

  1. Protection categories / levels / grades
  2. Physical damage makes life easier
  3. Reconnaissance & technical understanding are key
  4. Cables are underrepresented
  5. Tempest / physical clamping is underrepresented
  6. Alarm (detector) bypasses
  7. Seeing through walls/plastic works
  8. Miscellaneous
  9. References
Continue reading “Random thoughts on physical security measures”

Introduction to physical penetration tests

Depending on your personality the concept of being legally allowed to break into places has a kind of mythical ring to it. You’ve seen it happen in movies and series like James Bond, Mission Impossible, Leverage and a dozen others and you might have wondered is that how it really happens in real life? On some level you already know that the movie depictions are not that close to reality. Why? Mostly due to all those other stories of regular burglary where the break-in is much less sophisticated, yet very effective.

In this blog post I’m going to try and give an overview of physical penetration tests and how to start doing them from my own perspective (European context, we have to worry less about guns). In addition I will focus on the type of tests where a target asks you to ‘casually’ break in and gain access to a room, plant a device or steal some specific information. ‘Casually’, what does that even mean? In my experience it means that you get one or two days for your preparations and one day to execute the attack. Doesn’t seem like a lot, but you’d be surprised how many targets can be breached with minimal preparations, some courage and the fact that you aren’t really going to jail when caught ;)

I’m also no expert on this subject, so feel free to leave corrections as well as additional tips, tricks and personal experiences in the comments. Lastly, not all physical penetration tests will be the ideal take 4 weeks to do your thing type of job. So I consider it good practice to also be able to perform these type of smaller jobs where thinking on your feet is almost mandatory, not to mention fun if you like to practice your improvisation skills.

Before I forget, this information is mostly for your general running off the mill big corporation with standard security and where the target is just interested in an attacker that doesn’t invest a lot of time in the attack. Don’t attempt to access high security facilities with minimal preparation. Even though it might succeed, you will most likely strand at the first door or person that you attempt to bypass.

Continue reading “Introduction to physical penetration tests”